Diarrhoea-causing bacteria adapted to spread in hospitals
Scientists have discovered that the gut-infecting bacterium Clostridium difficile is evolving into two separate species, with one group highly adapted to spread in hospitals.
Researchers at the Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and collaborators, identified genetic changes in the newly-emerging species that allow it to thrive on the Western sugar-rich diet, evade common hospital disinfectants and spread easily. The researchers estimate this emerging species, which can cause debilitating diarrhoea, started to appear thousands of years ago and accounts for over two thirds of healthcare C. difficile infections.
Published in Nature Genetics, the largest ever genomic study of C. difficile shows how bacteria can evolve into a new species and demonstrates that C. difficile is continuing to evolve in response to human behaviour. The results could help inform patient diet and infection control in hospitals.
Clostridium difficile bacteria can infect the gut and are the leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea worldwide*. In a healthy person who is not taking antibiotics, millions of ‘good’ bacteria in the gut keep the C. difficile under control. However, antibiotics wipe out the normal gut bacteria, leaving the patient vulnerable to C. difficile infection in the gut. This is then difficult to treat and can cause bowel inflammation and severe diarrhoea.
Often found in hospital environments, C. difficile forms resistant spores that allow it to remain on surfaces and spread easily between people, making it a significant burden on the healthcare system. To understand how this bacterium is evolving, researchers collected and cultured 906 strains of C. difficile isolated from humans, animals, such as dogs, pigs and horses, and the environment. By sequencing the DNA of each strain, and comparing and analysing all the genomes, the researchers discovered that C. difficile is currently evolving into two separate species.
Leading bacterial genomics expert and paper author, Dr Sam Forster from Hudson Institute said “This work provides a new perspective into C. difficile outbreaks and how they could be managed, especially in environments such as hospitals and aged care facilities. The study demonstrates how detailed genomic understanding from fundamental research can provide important insights into the way our behaviour shapes the disease-causing bacteria we encounter.”
Dr Nitin Kumar, joint first author from the Wellcome Sanger Institute, said “Our large-scale genetic analysis allowed us to discover that C. difficile is currently forming a new species with one group specialised to spread in hospital environments. This emerging species has existed for thousands of years, but this is the first time anyone has studied C. difficile genomes in this way to identify it. This particular bacteria was primed to take advantage of modern healthcare practices and human diets, before hospitals even existed.”
The researchers found that this emerging species, named C. difficile clade A, made up approximately 70 per cent of the samples from hospital patients. The species displayed changes in genes that metabolise simple sugars, so the researchers then studied C. difficile in mice** and found that the newly emerging strains colonised in mice better when their diet was enriched with sugar. It had also evolved differences in the genes involved in forming spores, which produced a much greater resistance to common hospital disinfectants. These changes allow it to spread more easily in healthcare environments.
Dating analysis revealed that while C. difficile clade A first appeared about 76,000 years ago, the number of different strains started to increase at the end of the 16th Century, before the founding of modern hospitals. This group has since thrived in hospital settings with many strains that keep adapting and evolving.
Dr Trevor Lawley, the senior author from the Wellcome Sanger Institute, said “Our study provides genome and laboratory based evidence that human lifestyles can drive bacteria to form new species so they can spread more effectively. We show that strains of C. difficile bacteria have continued to evolve in response to modern diets and healthcare systems and reveal that focusing on diet and looking for new disinfectants could help in the fight against this bacteria.”
Professor Brendan Wren, an author from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said “This largest ever collection and analysis of C. difficile whole genomes, from 33 countries worldwide, gives us a whole new understanding of bacterial evolution. It reveals the importance of genomic surveillance of bacteria. Ultimately, this could help understand how other dangerous pathogens evolve by adapting to changes in human lifestyles and healthcare regimes, which could then inform healthcare policies.”
More information on C. difficile bacteria
C. difficile bacteria are found in the digestive system of about 1 in every 30 healthy adults. The bacteria often live harmlessly because other bacteria normally found in the bowel keep it under control. But some antibiotics can interfere with the balance of bacteria in the bowel, which can cause the C. difficile bacteria to multiply and produce toxins that make the person ill.
Once out of the body, the bacteria turn into resistant cells called spores. These can survive for long periods on hands, surfaces (such as toilets), objects and clothing unless they’re thoroughly cleaned, and can infect someone else if they get into their mouth.
Someone with a C. difficile infection is generally considered to be infectious until at least 48 hours after their symptoms have cleared up.
More information about C. difficile: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/c-difficile/
* Clostridium difficile infection: Epidemiology, diagnosis and understanding transmission, by JS Martin et al in Nature Reviews Gastroenterology 2016.
**The colonisation experiments were done in mice, which although an excellent model to study human disease, are different from humans.
Funding | This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust (098051), the UK Medical Research Council (PF451 and MR/K000511/1), the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (1091097 and 1159239 to S.F.) and the Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Support Program.
Hudson Institute Communications
t: + 61 3 8572 2697